777奇米影视一区二区三区-777人体粉嫩u美图-777色狠狠一区二区三区香蕉-777色淫网站女女-乱高h辣黄文np公交车-乱高h亲女

MBA、MPA、MPAcc英語二閱讀理解練習及答案

  The average number of authors on scientific papers is sky-rocketing. That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because U.S. government agencies have started to promote “team science”. As physics developed in the post-World War Ⅱ era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.

  Yet multiple authorship — however good it may be in other ways — presents problems for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, how should the liability be allocated among the authors? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review?

  Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much-cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.

  Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame.

  1. According to the passage, there is a tendency that scientific papers____________.

  A.are getting more complicated

  B.are dealing with bigger problems

  C.are more of a product of team work

  D.are focusing more on natural than on social sciences

  2. One of the problems with multiple authorship is that it is hard__________.

  A.to allocate the responsibility if the paper goes wrong

  B.to decide on how much contribution each reviewer has made

  C.to assign the roles that the different authors are to play

  D.to correspond with the authors when the readers feel the need to

  3. According to the passage, authorship is important when .

  A.practical or impractical suggestions of the authors are considered

  B.appointments and promotions of the authors are involved

  C.evaluators need to review the publication of the authors

  D.the publication of the authors has become much-cited

  4. According to the passage, whether multiple authors of a paper should be taken collectively or individually depends on______.

  A.whether judgments are made about the paper or its authors

  B.whether it is the credit or the blame that the authors need to share

  C.how many authors are involved in the paper

  D.where the paper has been published

  5. The best title for the passage can be___________.

  A.Writing Scientific Papers: Publish or Perish

  B.Collaboration and Responsibility in Writing Scientific Papers

  C.Advantages and Disadvantages of Team Science

  D.Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems

報考資格評估
請提供以下信息,招生老師會盡快與您聯系。符合報考條件者為您提供正式的報名表,我們承諾對您的個人信息嚴格保密。

相關文章

0/300
精彩留言

熱門學校

更多

熱門專題

2025年蘭州大學在職研究生分數線 2025年在職研究生報名時間、報名入口、報考條件 在職研究生報考條件 2025年鄭州大學在職研究生分數線
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品伦理久久久久久 | 正在播放国产尾随丝袜美女 | 亚洲成成熟老妇女 | 日本乱人伦片中文字幕三区 | 激情欧美一区二区三区 | 私人毛片 | 久久精品8| 国产系列欧美系列日韩系列在线 | 欧美日韩性高爱潮视频 | 日韩欧美无线在码 | 一级片黄色一级片 | 九九九国产视频 | 亚洲人成一区二区三区 | 狠狠色狠狠色综合日日92 | 国产特黄一级一片免费 | 综合精品在线 | 久久99精品这里精品动漫6 | 欧美成人另类人妖 | 18jzjzz国产 | 一级特黄特黄xxx视频 | 国产旗袍丝袜在线观看视频 | 日韩精品视频免费在线观看 | 免费观看国产精品 | 一级黄色免费片 | 欧美日韩成人高清在线播放 | 午夜免费视频观看 | 最好看2019高清中文字幕视频 | 日本精品一区二区三区在线视频 | 国产第一页福利 | 激情欧美一区二区三区中文字幕 | 一本久道久久综合中文字幕 | 色婷婷成人 | 国产视频色 | 日韩中文在线 | 高清欧美一级在线观看 | 看全色黄大色黄大片女图片第一次 | 日本视频www色变态 日本爽p大片免费观看 | 五月激情综合 | 全黄一级裸片视频免费区 | 三级黄网| 国产麻豆精品高清在线播放 |